On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:56 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote: > On 18 July 2007 at 7:35, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Same here. I normally use 24 bit 48 kHz, but 96 works fine as well. > > Recording straight into Ardour. > > So, what's the advantage of 48kHz over 44.1kHz? Does that advantage > outweigh whatever distortion is introduced from the sample rate > conversion going to 44.1kHz, in the event that the recording is > destined for a CD? I'm not partial to either rate, just curious > about the advantages & disadvantages. Is there really any audible distortion if you resample offline using a sinc resampler with a very large window? --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
