On 6/13/07, lra4691@xxxxxxx <lra4691@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Not to bash Ardour, but if the interface of Traverso is as superior as it seems, perhaps Ardour developers could learn a bit. I believe Ardour dev's should be focusing on improving the interface's responsiveness before adding new features, but everyone seems to be pushing for MIDI in the next release ;p
I suppose it depends on the goal, really. At first glance, Traverso seems to be aimed more towards an audience of home users, with the emphasis being on simplicity and an intuitive interface. Ardour is intended for serious (i.e. professional) audio work, and therefore has a correspondingly more complex interface. -TimH _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
