Re: [LAU] Proposal: OpenDAWS (long)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It seems a bit sad that any Linux advocate should be backing this operation, it would cost about $1500 per year to get access to any kind of support for the SDK or advice on best practices and cosiderably more if you really want to participate. You could stump up $175 per year yourself to propose changes as long as you can find somebody paying the full price or more to back you. It is a commercial directive not an open movement. From a perspective of Linux audio it is already a pain that the Midi Manufacturers Association want cash for their specifications.

So is the argument for this specification will be 'the professional applications will be using it' hence it becomes the standard?

The whole specification is delivered outside of a GPL, products using its specifications are expected to pay royalty licensing and as such should not be advocated as a part of any open source movement.

The proposal here was for an open format, not a closed consortium format, the difference may be subtle and is apparantly lost on some people.

N.

From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Proposal: OpenDAWS (long)
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:31:48 -0400

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 18:16 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Wonderfully, the linux audio opensource field has become nicely populated. > Opensource means freedom of choice. One is not tied to that $400 proprietary > bloated DAW program. Comes jack and one can dissect the functionality and > network smaller pieces (if one's system can handle the multiple processes).
> Trememdous freedom of choice.
>
> Problem is: No DAW program, opensource or otherwize, interoperates with any > other. Cakewalk works with Cakewalk, Cubase with Cubase, Ardour with Ardour, > etc. Each has its strengths and each has its adherents. Never the 'twain do
> meet. (Lash is fine but the restriction remains.)
>
> Proposal: OpenDAWS.

its actual name is AAF-XML. please google it.

--p


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux