Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2007 schrieb lanas: > Le Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:41:17 +0100 (WEST), > "Rui Nuno Capela" <rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Probably related to this, fludisynth soundfont loader has a rather big > > issue regarding memory leakage, so that each time you start a Qsynth > > engine your RAM will get eaten up, progressively, in small amounts. > > This is a fluidsynth flaw, not Qsynth's, and should be addressed to > > the fluid-dev list, one more time :) > > Or maybe rewrite a soundfont player altogether. Yeah, Paul Davis only talked about DAWs, so a new soundfont-player is much easier! And there aren't enough different soundfont-formats available, you will probably invent your own? > Maybe things like > having a separate volume control (at least -reverb and chorus could be > fine also) for each of the 16 sounds that can be played inside a > soundfont archive cannot be achieved with the current fluidsynth player. I don't get your problem. fluidsynth reacts quite well on midi-control. Just adjust the individual volume/pan/chorus/reverb with the corresponding midi-messages and you will get what you want. Why do you think it is easier to have that in a separate gui (like qsynth) instead of being stored in your rosegarden/muse/<any other midi-sequencer>-session? Arnold PS: My first paragraph is ironic... -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
pgp4RKz7Wb3Qa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
