On Thursday 19 April 2007, Charles Linart wrote: > > I don't know if jamin can be interconnected with audacity, but with > > ardour I would propose the following: > > 1. Import all your songs into one ardour-session. > > 2. Connect jamin as an insert-effect on the master-track. > > 3. Work your way through mastering... (takes the longest time) > > I'm not sure if I have a ram problem or if wires crossed somewhere, > but with both Ardour and JAMin working, the sound gets all chopped up > and horrible. CPU load jumps from about 3 percent to about 40 percent > with JAMin running as opposed to without. Everything seems kosher in > the patch bay and with the input/output connections in both Ardour and > JAMin > > Patchbay: JAMin outputs to Ardour, Ardour forwards to JAMin > Ardour: Ardour track outs 1 and 2 go to JAMin in L and R > JAMin: outputs back to Ardour's master track > > per this tutorial http://jamin.sourceforge.net/en/tutorial.html > > All I can think is that I need more ram but there's already a gig and > a half in my box. Is that enough, or am I doing something wrong with > the connections? The problem with jamin is the need to jack it from program to program in order to use it. A plugin to aurdour would be more efficient. My system cannot run such a setup either. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
