Re: [LAU] jackd & debian problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:33 -0500, Josh Lawrence wrote:
> hello list,
> 
> first off, I'm running debian etch, and installing everything via
> packages (sans the kernel).
> 
> last night I decided I wanted to try out the sequencer dino, which
> requires a later version of jack than my repos offer.  I uninstalled
> jack (which uninstalled other jack applications), and compiled the
> newest version of jack and qjackctl.  this is where the problem
> started...
> 
> now when I want to add a package from the repos, it wants to install
> the repos version of jack, and won't simply use the version I have
> compiled.  conflicts abound, and the net effect is that all jack apps
> are not working at the moment.
> 
> there must be some way in debian to say, "don't worry about the jackd
> dependency, I've already got that installed."  or am I doomed to
> compile everything from source now that I've compiled jack from
> source?  is it all or nothing?

This is how I do it:

1. Install the latest Debian package (using 'apt-get install
libjack0.100.0-0')
2. Get the JACK source package you need, configure it with
--prefix=/usr, build it and install it (without uninstalling the Debian
package)
3. Remove all files starting with libjack-0.100.0 in /usr/lib
4. Create a symbolic link: /usr/lib/libjack-0.100.0.so.0
-> /usr/lib/libjack.so

Done. Now old JACK programs from Debian packages should work (since the
database thinks that the JACK packages are still installed, although
they really have been overwritten) and programs requiring the newer API
(MIDI etc) should also work. If the libjack ABI ever becomes
incompatible with the old one your Debian packaged JACK clients may
start acting weird though.

Also, your JACK-from-source installation will be overwritten if you do
apt-get upgrade and there are newer JACK packages than the one you have
installed. But all you have to do then is to reinstall your source
build.

There are probably cleaner ways to do this (like copying over the debian
subdirectory from a Debian source package to your new tarball and build
a proper Debian package), but this works reasonably well for me.


--ll

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux