On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:34 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote: > > > Le Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:28:31 +0200, > > Frank Barknecht <fbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do run okay on 64 bit, I > > > guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though. > > > > Do you specifically mean the 32 bits packages running on a 64-bit > > platform ? > > No, I'm talking about real 64-bit Pd. There was a nasty bug with the > arrays and [table]s, when Pd was compiled for 64 bit. This seems to be > solved AFAIK. At least there's an amd64 package for Pd in Debian with > no open bug reports in regard to arrays. Do you know if this bug is solved in the current pd-extended cvs? -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
