On 4/10/07, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC Pearce wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron wrote: > > > Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing in a nicer manner? > > > Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think > > > folks of our intelligence and talent can do better. > > > > Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"? > > Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious. All this over > "sucks"! > > Wow, guys. Just.... wow. > > -DR- > > > P.S. This thread sucks It reminds me of my highschool year in the U.S. When parents and children were together no one used any "foul language", but when each of them were on their own, all you would hear was "fuck", "shit", "damn", and "suck", regularly used in normal conversation (though i have to admit that the kids used them a little more often than the parents). I often had to laugh about this :) It seemed so silly to me.
My friends loved coming over to my place because my mom swore and belched and let them too. You're right, it is silly. -Chuckk "Ever tell your kids you're glad that they can think? Ever say you love them, ever let them watch you drink?" -Frank Zappa -- http://www.badmuthahubbard.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
