On Friday 16 March 2007, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 04:59:16AM +0100, Florian Schmidt wrote: > > Yeah, you're right. I should shut up and let everyone decide for themself > > :) But since i had to rerecord it anyways to make more room for stuff i > > did try with click track. The result is definetly different, but i don't > > know whether it's nessecarily worse :) > > It's harsh and mechanical in comparison. Maybe it isn't the guitar so much, > just the steady shaker and the hit (plop). > > A fixed tempo makes it a lot easier to program beats to it, but it's not > like it would be impossible to follow the tempo with a tempo track (here > I wish there was a tapping-to-tempo-track feature). > > In both cases having guitar and shaker and plop on seperate tracks would > be nice. > > > Maybe the click isn't really a bad thing here.. > > I think it is and I say that as someone with tempo changes in like 2 out > of 60 tracks ;) And yeah, you guys are right when listening to it with a fresh ear. The shaker and blop are the most copy and pasty in the playalong, so, i guess one hears it :) So, what to do? I suppose it's up to you guys :) One possibility to get a more natural feel back into it again is rereceording the parts again, but relative to the already recorded ones (not to the click). I'll record a track of plonks first, then rerecord a full track of shakers.. Or if someone else wants to do some percussion.. But: do as you choose. If you rather want to play with the loose tempo version, go ahead :) BTW: i will upload seperate drum/guitar tracks of both versions for a start.. Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org
