Michael Bohle <opendaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes I hope in ten years LV2 for Linux is something like VST was in 2000. > But with opensource ideals we can't make a single note on a computer - > creating music did not need ideologys. The freedom is to have the choice to > use closed VST plugins on Linux. > > When i was started on linux, i thought "this is an open platform with creative > developers" now i start to realise that some devs using linux as a weapon > against the windmills named closed source. > > If audiolinux shall reach the musicans, VST must be integrated. Otherwise > audiolinux will always be a niche for some geeks like me. Request Steinberg to make Linux version on Cubase, Nuendo, etc. They don't care I suppose. Why should "some devs" care about stimulating propriatary software then? To slow libre software development? You call it weapon against the windmills, I call it freedom of choice. But that freedom is restricted by proprietary software. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Attachment:
pgpMkikQodSZQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
