On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:16 +0100, Lars Luthman wrote: > By that reasoning the logical thing to do would be to merge Rosegarden, > MuSE, and Ardour, Aldrin and Beast/BSE, Zyn and WhySynth etc etc. While > it may be more efficient in the short term, I think that having lots of > choices is good in the long term. The more choices the better. there is a huge difference between trying to merge existing source code, especially across GUI toolkits, and starting up Yet Another Thing That Does Something That Something Else Does Almost But Not Quite The Way I Imagined It. Also, what is long term?
