Re: Which distribution? (Used to be DeMuDi)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Asbjørn Sæbø hat gesagt: // Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
> 
> > DeMuDi, the distribution which I used to use, seems to have little 
> > activity.  Is is maintained in such a way that it is sensible to go with 
> > it again?  And if not so, what other suggestions do you have for a 
> > distribution for audio work?  (Studio64 is out of the question, as I 
> > have no 64-bit hardware.)  Simple low-latency setup is appreciated, as 
> > is something Debian-based and quite up-to-date.
> 
> 64 Studio also does a 32bit version: 
> http://www.64studio.com/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
> 
> Most of the work done on Demudi has flown back to Debian.
> 
> "Choose Debian, it's the system that's here to stay!"

But then one would probably have to use testing, to keep up?  Stable is 
a good and stable distribution, but most of the time severely lagging 
compared to current audio software, I would guess.

Asbjørn

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux