Re: Tuning Jack: Please help me prioritize IRQ 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duh, that was really silly. Sorry to bother you guys about something
that turns out to be so trivial, it really seemed like legit issue to me...

Apparently, I was using a non-patched kernel thinking it was a realtime
kernel.

Carlo

Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Florian Schmidt was kind enought to point out that I can increase my
> system performance by increasing the priority of both the Jack daemon
> and the IRQ that my trusty'ol bebob device is hitched to.
> 
> I temporarily gave up on putting the device onto another IRQ and will
> leaving that up to the kernel developers to sort out; what I am
> interested in right now is how to increase the priority of IRQ 10 on my
> system.
> 
> Florian suggested simply increasing the priority of the 'IRQ 10'
> interrupt handling process; but on my system, there is no interrupt
> handling process 'IRQ 10', or for any other IRQ, for that matter.
> 
> How can I increase the priority of 'IRQ 10' on my Debian based system?
> 
> Help much appreciated.
> 
> Carlo
> 
> PS: upping JackD priority alone took care of 60% of xruns; thanks Florian!
> 
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux