måndag 22 januari 2007 15:04 skrev Dave Phillips: > Btw, I did continue monitoring the traffic for the /. thread re: music > sequencing software for Linux. Same old same old. Paul got some good > response, but overall I'd say the thread was a waste of everybody's > time. The ignorance on /. regarding Linux audio development is simply > too deep, and I see little indication that posters there want to do > little but echo the same old mantras. To get visibility for LA[UD] the debate should be started by the LA[UD] side. Not the contrary. The problem is that people don't bother to read more than 1 or 2 comments. At least I do that and I concider myself sort of normal. I should say that I got tired of /. a few years ago so I'm not that up to date whats happening on there but I did read this article that we are talking about. So. Receipt for small success. Schedule a few articles on /. Especially articles from the people who develop software and people who use them. Not the debaters who debate for it's own sake. > Has any user on this list come here by being persuaded by what he or she > has read on Slashdot ? If you aske me, that is a definite no. regards, /bengan
