Re: This criticism of jackd valid?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/21/07, Lars Luthman <lars.luthman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 07:46 -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> As much more of a music maker than a developer, I'm not able to evaluate
> whether this post from a current thread on Slashdot is a valid criticism
> of JACK:
>
> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=217898&cid=17700570

Looks like a troll.
If he knows a better solution, where is it?

There's no way to have big processing period and low-latency at the same time.
If you are processing your audio in big chunks, then there's just no
sense to use short hw-buffers (if only to stress irq subsystem).

So, this post is BS.

The only thing that may be useful, is to have cients with different
period sizes in the same graph. But it's quite hard to implement,
though possible.

Regards,
Dmitry.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux