Re: sample rate question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joshua Boyd wrote:

> Another option would be 88.2.  Better quality that CD, but an even
> multiple with might reduce down sampling artifacts.

If you are using libsamplerate for downsamping, there will be no
discernable difference when doing 96k -> 44.2k as opposed to
88.2k -> 44.1k.

Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
from religious conviction."  -- Blaise Pascal, mathematician, 1670

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux