On 1/3/07, James Stone <jamesmstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:58:43PM +0100, Marc-Olivier Barre wrote: > On 1/2/07, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Talking about reverbs and convolution, I gave a try to jack-convolve. > >> It seems it does not compile with gcc 4.1.0.... asm problem (even with > >> the latest stable). > >> > >> Does someone knows of a patch to fix this ? > > > >It builds fine here with gcc 4.1.2. jack_convolve only uses ASM through > >libconvolve which can be built using libDSP (which in turn contains some > >ASM > >code).. > > > >Let us see the whole error messages maybe? > > > > Right... I was too fast writing this post :-) > > It is libDSP which contains some assembly code that doesn't seem to > compile well with my gcc. I have used the latest stable (5.0.2) which > (according to the changelog) contains "Support for gcc-4.x". > Just build it with gcc-3.4.
I don't have it on my system and I don't intend to set it up unless I have a real problem. The fact is, my system is a modified LFS, composed of more than 500 packages that ALL compiled fine with gcc 4.1.0 (only a few of them required a patch to compile properly). Actually, all the packages I have seen in the past few months that had a problem with gcc 4.x just called it a bug and fixed it or (as is the case with linuxsampler's assembly routines) decided to adapt their software to take advantage of gcc 4.x new optimization stuff.... Why shall I install gcc 3.4 instead of reporting what a majority of people call a bug ? Cheers __________________ Marc-Olivier Barre, Markinoko.
