Re: Real-time kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21/06, M P Smoak <smoak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 08:47 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> its deeply pathetic, and i think that intel should be absolutely
> ashamed of what they have done. even creative did a better job than
> this, without even trying to: the SB16 was a standard; not very good,
> but a standard nevertheless.
>
> --p

and deeply confining too.  Users, mostly "consumers", relegated to being
listeners and viewers of the creations of others.  Not allowed to record
or produce, just consume.  But, Wow: they've got the Latest and
Greatest.

And the foss folks walk on by, hardly seeing ...

I don't follow that last part.  I agree, SoundBlaster is embarrassing,
but they have the supply for a demand.  Should hardware be free too?
Should everything be free?

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux