On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 20:38 -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote: > On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:29, Thomas Vecchione wrote: > > I'm curious, I couldn't find information on licensing on the page, > > repeatedly they say free, but I am curious whether they mean free as in > > open-source, or free as in beer. > > > > Seablade > > Good catch - this changes my opinion on things. > > Member of programming team Ykkrosh: > > "0 A.D. is (according to the current plans) going to be 'free' as in no cost, > but not all 'Free' as in freedom (or even as in open source) (though some > components are likely to be) - so it can't be called 'free software', and > would probably not be accepted by GNU people." Why not make it free in all meanings of the word? -- Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
