Joseph M. Gaffney wrote: > >> What's the difference? Couldn't I just keep FC5 and not go to FC6, for >> example. Or, does CentOS have an easy upgrade path? >> > > CentOS is simply RHEL (which is based on Fedora), and is supported for longer > than FC, but by the CentOS developers and contributors. > Now I remember, it's an enterprise version based on RHEL. However, I don't know how much of Fedora is in RHEL. RHEL was started years before Fedora. I imagine there is some, but doesn't Redhat pick and choose what to put in. Besides, it's built for the enterprise, and stability as you say. As their site says: CentOS-4 is a freely distributable OS built from the source at: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/i386/SRPMS To me, that sounds like it would be a couple of steps back from FC. What do other use and are you happy with the upgrades?
