Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



carmen wrote:
the e17 default theme is pretty damn ugly, however. and unless you want to spend 6 months learning how to compress .edje files into .ewz and then pack them into .eapp containers so .ebjx can load them, instead of say making music or using a window manager that doesnt take 106 MB of RAM, you probably cant make a better theme..



although i made up some of those .eformats, similarly named ones do exist, and the RAM part is no lie. lat time i built it a few months ago, it took precisely 100 times as much RAM as the WM i'm currently using..

It's too early to talk about e17, I've been very confused about e17 binary file format, but it starts to be usuable with graphical front-end to edit everything. But please don't forget it's still experimental, you can't say today, ardour2 is a bunch of bug and memory leaks, it's out of context. e17 is like ardour2 you can see that it will be a very good app in the future.

About the mem usage you was not lucky, e17 consumes 22m with latest e17 source code (and I can't remember of such mem usage in the past).

e17 is light, *smooth* and very responsive, IMHO look&*feel* is very important, e17 is very good at perf VS. feel.

It's just a matter of taste here but please don't argue with perf argument with e17.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux