Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From: Rob <lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:43:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <453FDBAA.60607@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: kudla.org
References: <20061025123237.EC3BB3A6B42C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1161808837.2309.115.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453FDBAA.60607@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Wednesday 25 October 2006 17:48, mik wrote:
> in nautilus you can add that functionality with a script.

"You" might be able to, and I'm sure I could, but a user who 
doesn't know what a bash prompt or a configuration file is?

Rob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: mik

References:
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Paul Davis
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: mik

Prev by Date: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Previous by thread: RE: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux