Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:58:57 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <20061025123237.EC3BB3A6B42C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20061025123237.EC3BB3A6B42C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Drucer Ninetynine:


Hello list!

...

I have always wondered why people bother to use other window managers thanfvwm? I know about variety and choice, he he, but its like using beos,windows vista, macosx, hurd, or some other fancy new OS instead of linux,which is fast enough, extremely stable, and can be configured to beor do whatever. Just like fvwm.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Rob

Prev by Date: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Previous by thread: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux