On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 15:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:43 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > > On 9/20/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2.6.18-rt2 is out now, it's worth a try. > > > > > > I'd be interested to see if the problem can be reproduced with > > > the .config I posted. Neither I nor the 64studio guys nor any of their > > > users can reproduce these problems at all. > > > > > > Lee > > > > 2.6.18-rt2 doesn't boot on my AMD64 machine. > > > > 2.6.17-rt5 is fine. 2.6.17-rt8 is unreliable booting for me. > > > > I'd suggesting giving Ingo a few days to work through the initial > > reports before anyone do *too* much work with the 2.6.18-rt stuff. > > Just my thoughts. > > On the bright side, 2.8.18-rt* is the first -rt patch since 2.6.13 or so > to be *smaller* than the previous one, due to many -rt only features > going into mainline for 2.6.18. Hopefully this trend will continue... > > Lee I don't know if you've seen this or not, but that is definitely the plan: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3627831 Dana
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
