On Thu August 24 2006 20:05, Thomas Vecchione wrote: > As much as I agree with you Lee on this, which may be a rare > occasion between us, personally as you mentioned before, this > entire debate was beaten to death, resurrected, and beaten to I have an archive of the previous LinuxSampler discussions. It's a few dozen messages. I challenge you to provide the message ID's of any messages in those threads discussing the two specific issues I brought up. You can't, because everyone was too busy going, "Hey, they're violating the GPL" or "No, they're not" or "Hmm, I wonder if Tascam is behind this" to wonder if Linuxsampler is violating the OSI trademark or the FSF's copyright on the text of the GPL. Rob