On Sat August 19 2006 14:21, Jan Depner wrote: > Qt is much better than wxWidgets. Unfortunately, for your > use in a closed source package, you'd have to pay for the Qt may be "better", but at this point it would require a rewrite.... if you look at his original post, it includes a screenshot of a working Windows version. wx is free, even for proprietary software, and lets you write Windows and Mac ports with native UI's. Qt may let you do those things, and I personally much prefer it over wx for my own coding, but it would not only cost him like $1100, it would require he rewrite his app a second time. Rob
