On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 14:51 -0400, Rob wrote: > On Wed August 16 2006 14:30, Lee Revell wrote: > > Well, I happen to think the law is correct and logical in this > > case. My creations are my property, and I should have the > > same right to make a living by selling them as a sculptor or a > > baker or a carpenter does. Copying my creations without my > > permission denies me the right to make a living by selling my > > creations, in exactly the same way that theft deprives a maker > > of physical objects of that right. > > It's true that copyright holders managed to get the laws changed > in most places to fit what they would like reality to be, but > reality remains unchanged. Copying is still just copying, not > moving. By "managed to get the laws changed" are you referring to the US constitution? English common law from the 18th century? Copyright didn't start with the DMCA you know... Lee
