Re: Advice on desktop/platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/2/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:04 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:39 -0400, M P Smoak wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 August 2006 11:58, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > Disagree, using Fluxbox over Gnome is not likely to make a
difference
> > > > with a recent kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Lee
> > >
> > > Lee, do you think that the same can be said about KDE rather than
Gnome?
> >
> > Yes.  With a kernel patched for realtime, or a recent unpatched 2.6
> > kernel, the choice of desktop/window manager will have no impact on
> > realtime audio performance (as measured by number of xruns), as long as
> > JACK is running in realtime mode.
> >
> > The belief that stripping down your desktop will improve realtime audio
> > performance is a holdover from the bad old 2.4/early 2.6 days.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> >
>
> though if you have limited memory it can still help, right? I.e if the
> system needs to swap because of a big desktop running? Not that i
> really know, i run KDE and i've got 2GB ram ;)
>

I guess if you are very resource constrained it would help.  Audio
performance won't be affected, your desktop just might get slower if you
run into swap.  But I was referring to the general case.

Lee



So short answer is really running a decent kernel solves all the other
worries ;)

Loki

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux