Re: Re: Wiki

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat July 8 2006 13:00, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> 20 MB vs 13.5 GB makes me think the wiki is not of the best
> technology. The download software could be better as well. I
> will mail my suggestions to wget list.

TWiki has a "publish" plugin (I think I've mentioned it before) 
that dumps a static, rendered version of all its pages with 
links rewritten in a way that makes sense, and optionally zips 
it (or maybe I added the zipping part to my local copy, I can't 
remember.)  

Unfortunately, TWiki has also been swiss cheese security wise in 
my experience, but with mediawiki's prominence I would think 
that someone must have written something like a "publish" plugin 
by now to do the same thing.

I don't think the problem with mirroring wikis can really be 
fixed with a patch to wget.... it's the nature of dynamically 
generated content that a tool designed to retrieve static 
content will retrieve way more data than it needs to.  The same 
would apply if you were trying to mirror a web forum or a more 
traditional CMS.

Rob

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux