On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 17:36 +0000, carmen wrote: > woops, actualy meant Chuck, PD, and SCLang. Shouldn't this be trivial to fix if the code is sanely written? Lee
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 17:36 +0000, carmen wrote: > woops, actualy meant Chuck, PD, and SCLang. Shouldn't this be trivial to fix if the code is sanely written? Lee
|