-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Knecht escribió: > On 5/29/06, tim hall <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wednesday 24 May 2006 01:01, Mark Knecht was like: >> > I have not tried the pam enabled realtime methods as there doesn't >> > seem to be any value spending the time to do it just yet. >> >> I am, and I have to say I think there is value in it. I'm using the >> debianised >> patched PAM modules from RFA (thanks Eric!) so it took me all of 10 >> minutes >> to set up. I guess it's a bit more fiddly on Gentoo. > > Probably it's no different on Gentoo. However the required version of > PAM is not marked stable on Gentoo. Don't know why that is but without > going to a (currently) testing version of PAM it's not supported. > > That said, what's the value in doing work, changing things, and then > dealing with side effects? realtime-lsm works so I use it. I'll change > when the kernel no longer supports it. > > Cheers, > Mark > For instance Fedora Core 5 has the version of PAM required... Say, if I grab my kernel's .srpm, modify the spec to it includes this patch, make sure that this patch will play nice with the rest of the Fedora patches and am successful to build and install the generated kernel, how would I make use of the PAM controls to set user-space real-time priorities? PS: I read the thread, but the e-mail containing the pam controls was accidentally erased, were those the ones needed with this patch? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfHoFXM+XOp70dwoRAs/eAJ9cybvoB2LeCRjbAa7KE6zY8BHdAgCfaBJ8 OMoZhuQnnbdWrxjPvsnYZfg= =Xxmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
