Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
From: Ichthyostega <prg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 02:38:24 +0200
In-reply-to: <1148404388.12529.83.camel@mindpipe>
References: <200605241028.02843.tito@xxxxxxxxxx> <1148404388.12529.83.camel@mindpipe>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060411)

Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> Reiserfs is a poor choice of filesystem for low latency.
> 

what about XFS? I am running XFS on my audio partions without any problems...

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Ivica Ico Bukvic

References:
- Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Wolfgang Woehl
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Lee Revell

Prev by Date: error compiling an ALSA demo program
Next by Date: Re: quiting fsck
Previous by thread: Re: card abruptly changed name
Next by thread: RE: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux