Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:45:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <20060524004900.GB5598@sprite>
References: <200605241028.02843.tito@xxxxxxxxxx> <200605231025.07838.aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200605250110.47722.tito@xxxxxxxxxx> <5bdc1c8b0605231701t514c136cs7a6635923c56b2a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060524004900.GB5598@sprite>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 09:49 +0900, Joel Roth wrote:
> Does realtime-lsm offer any performance benefits over simply
> running relevant sound apps as root? I'm aware of the security
> benefits. 

No.

Lee

References:
- Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Wolfgang Woehl
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Aaron Krister Johnson
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Wolfgang Woehl
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Mark Knecht
- Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
  - From: Joel Roth

Prev by Date: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Next by Date: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Previous by thread: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Next by thread: Re: Low latency with 2.6.16.16 vanilla
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux