On Sun, 7 May 2006 01:48:51 -0400 Rob <lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun May 7 2006 01:28, Lee A. Azzarello wrote: > > other local Brooklyn bands. Because of this license they can > > release the compilation album and sell it from a "sublicencee" > > company without notifying the bands who composed or performed > > the music. They own this product through and through. The > > bands might not be entitled to a percentage of the profit > > unless they or their laywers get involved. That's the point. > > And what I'm saying is that I think they and their sublicencees > would have to only distribute said album through myspace.com in > order to satisfy the "on or through the Service" part of the > terms. But I guess it's ambiguous enough that it'd have to go > to court, and lord only knows they'll change it again before > that happens. > > Rob I think the bottom line is that, whatever the fine details are, anyone who wants to retain a semblance of control over their creative work should avoid this organisation like it were the plague. I have looked at their home page twice now. I will NEVER go there again, unless someone tells me they think they have seen some of my work on there. -- F
