On Sat May 6 2006 20:46, Lee A. Azzarello wrote: > You missed the part about sublicense: > "(with the right to sublicense through unlimited levels of > sublicensees)" I don't think the right to sublicense trumps the limitation to "on and through the Services", but again, I'm no lawyer. If it doesn't, then that clause merely exists to cover their asses when they decide to outsource hosting, management, et al. to Sites'R'Us in Bangalore. Rob
