Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:04:41 -0700
"Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
  This thread is happening on the Linux Kernel Mailing List. Since
I'm not a programmer I don't understand the full ramifications. Can
someone here tell me would this render the realtime-lsm module
unusable and if so what would I have to do to get realtime operation
without realtime-lsm?
That would soooo suck, as my favourite distro is debian and the feature
wishlist item for rtlimits enabled PAM is already several months old. I
suppose they'll probably take another year to apply the goddamn patch to
libpam.
Maybe it is time to switch distros. Do [K]Ubuntu have this already?

There are patched pam packages for both sarge and etch on debrfa:
http://ftp.techweb.rfa.org/debrfa/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/
http://ftp.techweb.rfa.org/debrfa/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/

source packages are there as well in main/source/ for both.

-Eric Rz

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux