Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/17/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:16 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I suppose all this would mean is that we cannot move forward with new
> > kernels after they do this until the Gentoo guys have an ebuild for
> > set_rlimits. (rlimits or rtlimits?)
>
> This is really not an ideal solution.  The focus should be on getting
> PAM upgraded.
>
> Lee
>
>
Lee,
   Is that what is specifically required or do we need PAM updated AND
some new ebuild for set_rlimits?

   I don't want to ask for something and then have it be a partial solution.

   Christoph is correct about what's available at this time:

mark@lightning ~ $ eix sys-libs/pam
* sys-libs/pam
     Available versions:  0.77-r6 ~0.77-r8 0.78-r2 0.78-r3 ~0.78-r4 ~0.78-r5
     Installed:           0.78-r3
     Homepage:            http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/
     Description:         Based on the multilib eclass


Found 1 matches
mark@lightning ~ $

thanks,
Mark


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux