On 4/13/06, tim hall <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > CAVEAT: I haven't used LS in 6-8 months since they switched the > > license to non-Open Source. > > I know this is a pointless comment, but really, what is the point in > making an application with 'Linux' in the name that is not open source? > > Seems rather backward to me. Rather. I completely agree. When people use the Open Source community to develop an application, but then take it private in an apparentl attempt to use it for their personal financial benefit, we get things like this happening. It's not that it isn't available. I suppose it is. I just use GigaStudio and Acid Pro for my sampling and loop playing needs and left LS behind. All of this is supposition and patently unfair, I'm sure, but the developers wouldn't explain their actions in an open forum so that we'd understand it so we were (I was) left with no option but to guess. Cheers, Mark
