> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-audio-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-audio- > user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Dantan Rzewnicki > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:29 PM > To: A list for linux audio users > Cc: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: More about consolidation of the Linux > audioonline resources (was: linuxdj...) > > ico wrote: > > Sounds absolutely fine by me! > > > > I am not sure which would sound better, linuxaudio.org/developers or > > linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit. Should we have both (via a > > sym-link)? > > > > Please contact me off-list for the necessary login info so that I can > begin > > uploading stuff. > > So, Do we have a new LAD site available now? > > -ERic Rz. Not yet, I initially misunderstood Paul by skimming over his e-mail that he wanted to move the content. Now that I've figured that out, it seems that the only thing we need to get the site linked is Paul's current URL/IP where he's hosting the content. Paul? Also, I am not sure what would be more effective in terms of linking linuxaudio.org/developer or linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit (the first does not have any redundancy in its name, but the second one is more accurate in terms of traditional LAD name). Perhaps someone else wants to chime in with an opinion on this one, or should we simply link both of them for the time being so that the site becomes available while we discuss the details? ;-) Ico
