On Sat March 11 2006 15:18, Maluvia wrote: > Just for clarification: > I believe Carlo's intent was to discuss things that *could* be > done with music - not what *should* or *must* be done. That could be what he meant, but what he said was, > so it appears that music that is made to be traded for shelter > and clothing ought to contain messages that let the receiver > be able to produce more shelter and clothing. "Ought to" and "should" are really synonymous. > (Be ye of the fighting Irish by any chance?) :) Only half ;) Rob
