Re: Re: favorite window Manager for making music?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:00 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:49 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:30 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 15:28 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 13:19 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> > > > > There's a bunch of information on that on my site (albeit outdated).
> > > > > Tuning the disk drives is a must and it *will* help but there are
> > > > > instances where the disk drive is busy and you can't get to it no
> > > > > matter
> > > > > how well tuned it is.  I prefer to minimize any chance of that.  You
> > > > > have to remember that unless you're running RTLinux or VXWorks (or DOS
> > > > > or VMS) you're not running a hard real time system.  Shit happens.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The -rt kernel with fuill preemption actually is a hard real time system
> > > > (no one claims it is in the same league of reliability as QNX or
> > > > VXWorks, yet...) - it should be able to guarantee response times.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > >     While I agree that it's very good it's not hard real-time.  It can't
> > > do guaranteed 15 microsecond interrupt response.  It is a very good soft
> > > real-time system.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hard RT is not about what the response time is, it's about whether you
> > can guarantee to make some arbitrary deadline, which the -rt patch can
> > theoretically do (I say theoretically because you still would have to
> > audit a limited set of code paths for RT safeness).
> > 
> 
> 
>     I beg to differ.  Hard real-time guarantees the response time.  Most
> good hard real-time systems actually do respond in the 10-15 microsecond
> range (though that is not a requirement of hard real-time).  Theory has
> no place in hard real-time.  Check with Monta Vista and see if they
> think the kernel with RT patches is hard real-time.
> 

Well, of course, Monta Vista is selling their own RT kernel!

What I mean is that the difference between a hard RT system and a soft
RT system is not between a guaranteed 15us response and a guaranteed
15ms response, it's between the ability to guarantee ANY response time
and only being able to meet the deadline 99.9999999% of the time.

Lee


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux