Hallo, Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > > That is rediculous. Do you really have to start program that way > > to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope) > > that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a > > long time still. > > Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous. As ridiculous as having to start another program before being able to get audio in and out of Ardour? ;) > In the upcoming Ubuntu Dapper release this will Just Work. No patching > the kernel or PAM or cryptic CLI utilities. As I wrote, PAM is another solution and it's the one to prefer in the long run, but it's the harder one to get right now, *if* your distribution doesn't have patched packages. (Does Slackware still ship without PAM?) The set_rtlimits approach is dead simple compared to that. It even is dead simple compared to realtime-LSM, if someone doesn't want to mess with kernel-modules, because it is completely in userspace. But of course if someone already has the LSM set up and has no problems with it, (s)he should continue to use it. Deprecated doesn't mean disfunctional. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
