On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:35 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:03:52PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > > > > > That is rediculous. Do you really have to start program that way > > > to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope) > > > that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a > > > long time still. > > > > > > > Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous. > > Is it really ? If you start apps via an icon or menu, you > don't see any difference at all. If you use a terminal > to start them, just define an alias. Having a prefix such > as nice, sudo, or rt_limits -r is not really worse than > having options (IMHO). > No, it's not that bad, but IMHO it's more of a pain than the realtime LSM, or the PAM solution. It's just too confusing for users when there are 3 different ways to do the same thing for no apparent reason. So I'm recommending they stick with realtime LSM until the new rlimits are fully supported by most distros. Lee
