Re: realtime-preempt without PAM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 14:04 -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I've been using the Realtime LSM with 2.6 for some time now, but
> recent issues with apps getting dropped from Jack makes me think I
> should explore realtime preempt.
> 
> I've built myself 2.6.15.1-rt16 and have it running.  Everything I've
> read has information on configuring PAM to setup limits.  My box is
> running Slackware, which doesn't use PAM.
> 
> Is there some software I can use instead of PAM, for this purpose?
> 
> 

Please reread the list archives, you are completely misunderstanding the
relationship between realtime-preempt, realtime LSM, and PAM.  Florian
and I have explained it many times.

Short version: Forget about PAM,  Just use the -rt kernel together with
the realtime LSM.

Lee


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux