On Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Spencer Russell wrote: > Hullo, there, > I'm working on getting usable latency on my laptop with a crappy > integrated Via chipset(Right now the best I can do without xruns is > 2x1024). From what I can tell it looks like it might hep to thread the > IRQs, so I'm applying ingo's realtime-preempt patch to a vanilla > 2.6.15.1. I have been using the gentoo suspend2 sources, and I've > gotten really used to just hibernating my computer when I'm not using > it, and I'd like to keep doing that, but it seems the suspend2 patches > are incompatible with the realtime-preempt patches. I think I'll be > able to handle going in manually and figuring out where the problems > are, but I figured that it's possible someone might have already done > the work for me, so I figured I'd ask. So, anyone using suspend2 and > realtime-preempt together? have you tried applying both patches over another? theres a chance they don't conflict. assuming they do,, you could try suspend, or standby, instead of hibernate. they use a bit more power since since the contents of RAM are preserved. or just switch to initng and fluxbox, and boot into a usable desktop from scratch in about 10 seconds.. > > Thanks, > spencer
