Loki Davison:
On 2/6/06, leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx <leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Loki,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
The engine however is very light weight
Also in terms of dependencies?
if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.
Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
(which is quite stable in its own right).
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
From the om site.
The Om engine (which can be built by itself) requires:
Liblo 0.22 and above
Jack 0.99 and above.
And can optionally use:
Alsa sequencer
DSSI
LADSPA
It would also be great for overworked Dave to get some help ;-)
Sorry, thats not the complete truth. It also requires:
Gtkmm 2.4 and above.
LibGlademm 2.4 and above.
FlowCanvas
...which is only available on newer linux distributions. I once tried to
compile up gtk 2.4, but I was unable because my glibc was too old. I only
have rh8, and I don't think thats very uncommon.
Om has to work with older versions of gtk to get more users. Until then,
I don't think this software has really come out of the beta-stage yet.
