Hi Paul, thanks for replying! I'm shaken with the depth of your knowledge, as always! :) >>Similar to 96 khz. Totally useless. > although i agree about 192, 96 does have one distinct benefit. the > higher the SR, the easier it is to make a really nice brickwall filter How very detailed... Thankya! > and once again, please recall that the most of greatest recordings of > the last 50 years were almost done on technology whose "sound quality" > would generally be laughed at today. Yeah... yeah, yeah, yeah I'm hanging that one up over my bed. Carlo
