Joe Hartley escribe:
> In a side by side test, I _think_ my old ears hear the slightest of
> differences between recordings done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44
Are you sure that those differences are based on the sampling
frequency?
> but in the end, I decided to save the disk space and always record
> at 16/44
That's a wise decision.
> since everything I do is going to get resampled to that anyway for
> CDs.
As everything should be dithered while mastering, I would not worry
about resampling. Please note that I focus my comments on bit depth
more than in sampling frequency.
Cordially, Ismael
--
Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande cherté
http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/
Attachment:
pgpjXeC1aXAod.pgp
Description: PGP signature
