Re: 192kHz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Hartley wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:28:08 +0100
Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@xxxxxxx> wrote:

My question, how useful is 192kHz for practical purposes? How quickly is
that likely to change? I'd really appreciate some advice here, thank you.

I've got a card that does 24/96 (a Delta 1010).  In a side by side test,
I _think_ my old ears hear the slightest of differences between recordings
done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44, but in the end, I decided to save
the disk space and always record at 16/44, since everything I do is going to
get resampled to that anyway for CDs.

About the bit depth, I always use 24bit. In this way if the sound level of a recorded track is not high enough I have more dynamic range to use when I mixdown in 16bit.

c.
--
www.cesaremarilungo.com

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux