On 1/3/06, charles thorley <charlesthump@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > thanks dave! i read your article in linuxjournal > about seq24, which was one of the things that got me > interested in it. i'm hoping to get in touch with > some people who have been using it for playing out, > but even in the absence of feedback like that, i'm > leaning towards seq24 right now (as opposed to a > hardware sequencer). > > i read a comment... > > http://unit-e.cc/knowledge/index.php?id=MidiSequencers > > ...that suggested that it's lacking as a drumseq. i'm > not sure what would make it better for > bass/melody/etc. than drums (as the writer suggests) - > any thoughts on the matter? > > -c I think it's a very usable sequencer for everything. I use it for drum stuff in preference to anything else, with smack. http://smack.berlios.de I use it that way for both live use and non-live production. Though live use has so far been limited to just playing alone or small shows to go with talks about smack. I think most of the om-synth crowd use seq24. I think the problem they are suggesting for drum is that there is no drum map i.e notes don't say what they are unlike hydrogen. This really has never been a problem for me. Loki
